Einreiseverbot
Entry ban

Care for relatives and entry bans: when dependency matters

When care, support and actual dependency carry weight in entry-ban and Article 8 ECHR reviews.

Mag. Mirela Saric
Your contact person

Mag. Mirela Saric

Attorney at law · German and BCS

Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.

19 July 2026 · Mag. Mirela Saric, Attorney at Law

Care for relatives can matter in an entry-ban case where it goes beyond ordinary family closeness. Actual dependency is decisive: who needs which help, how often, why from this person and what alternatives exist?

This article separates care and dependency from general family life. It focuses on evidence that can be used concretely in the proportionality review under Section 9 BFA-VG and Article 8 ECHR.

Place your situation

Is this actual dependency or ordinary family support?

Answer a short question. You receive a first orientation on which review step matters now.

Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.

01 Question 1

What dependency exists concretely?

Care and support need concrete evidence. General family closeness is usually not enough.

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

Care needs can carry substantial weight.

With illness, care level or daily support, current medical findings, a care plan, scope of support and lack of alternatives matter. This does not replace medical advice.

02

Daily dependency must be traceable.

Financial support, accompanying appointments or organising daily life should be evidenced concretely. It matters why this particular person is needed.

03

Ordinary ties are usually not enough alone.

Family closeness is important, but rarely enough on its own. The question is whether actual dependency goes beyond usual support.

Dependency is more than family closeness

Article 8 ECHR protects family life. With adult relatives or more distant family members, however, authorities often ask more closely whether actual dependency exists. Mere closeness, visits or emotional bonds carry less weight than concrete care and support.

The general framework is explained on the focus page family life and private life. This article focuses on care and dependency.

Which care evidence is useful

Useful documents include medical findings, care allowance decisions, medication plans, confirmations by mobile services, appointment overviews and a short description of actual daily life. Evidence on lack of alternatives can also matter.

If children are affected, the review changes. The article on children and family deals with that separate focus.

Residence titles and particular hardship should be considered

Care can also appear in adjacent questions concerning residence titles for especially weighty reasons. This does not automatically mean that a title will be granted. It shows, however, that medical, family and factual circumstances must be reviewed together.

More on the adjacent topic is available in the article on residence titles for especially weighty reasons.

Important: Do not only write that someone needs help. Explain which concrete help is provided daily or weekly and why another form of care is not realistically sufficient.

FAQ

Care for relatives and entry bans: when dependency matters

Does caring for a parent count in an entry-ban case? +

It can count where the care need is evidenced concretely and actual dependency exists. General family closeness is usually not enough.

Which documents help in illness cases? +

Current medical findings, care allowance material, medication plans, service schedules, confirmations from carers and a traceable description of daily life are helpful.

Must the care take place in Austria? +

That depends on the concrete situation. What matters is where the person needing care lives, which help is actually provided and whether reasonable alternatives exist.

Topics
Entry banCareFamily lifeArticle 8 ECHR

Entry ban, return decision, a running appeal deadline?

In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg