Care needs can carry substantial weight.
With illness, care level or daily support, current medical findings, a care plan, scope of support and lack of alternatives matter. This does not replace medical advice.
When care, support and actual dependency carry weight in entry-ban and Article 8 ECHR reviews.
Mag. Mirela Saric
Attorney at law · German and BCS
Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.
Care for relatives can matter in an entry-ban case where it goes beyond ordinary family closeness. Actual dependency is decisive: who needs which help, how often, why from this person and what alternatives exist?
This article separates care and dependency from general family life. It focuses on evidence that can be used concretely in the proportionality review under Section 9 BFA-VG and Article 8 ECHR.
Answer a short question. You receive a first orientation on which review step matters now.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
Care and support need concrete evidence. General family closeness is usually not enough.
With illness, care level or daily support, current medical findings, a care plan, scope of support and lack of alternatives matter. This does not replace medical advice.
Financial support, accompanying appointments or organising daily life should be evidenced concretely. It matters why this particular person is needed.
Family closeness is important, but rarely enough on its own. The question is whether actual dependency goes beyond usual support.
Article 8 ECHR protects family life. With adult relatives or more distant family members, however, authorities often ask more closely whether actual dependency exists. Mere closeness, visits or emotional bonds carry less weight than concrete care and support.
The general framework is explained on the focus page family life and private life. This article focuses on care and dependency.
Useful documents include medical findings, care allowance decisions, medication plans, confirmations by mobile services, appointment overviews and a short description of actual daily life. Evidence on lack of alternatives can also matter.
If children are affected, the review changes. The article on children and family deals with that separate focus.
Care can also appear in adjacent questions concerning residence titles for especially weighty reasons. This does not automatically mean that a title will be granted. It shows, however, that medical, family and factual circumstances must be reviewed together.
More on the adjacent topic is available in the article on residence titles for especially weighty reasons.
Important: Do not only write that someone needs help. Explain which concrete help is provided daily or weekly and why another form of care is not realistically sufficient.
It can count where the care need is evidenced concretely and actual dependency exists. General family closeness is usually not enough.
Current medical findings, care allowance material, medication plans, service schedules, confirmations from carers and a traceable description of daily life are helpful.
That depends on the concrete situation. What matters is where the person needing care lives, which help is actually provided and whether reasonable alternatives exist.
Further reading on Family and private life in connection with entry bans and immigration proceedings.
Further reading on Children and family in connection with entry bans and immigration proceedings.
Further reading on Residence title for especially weighty reasons in connection with entry bans and immigration proceedings.
Further reading on Family life and private life in connection with entry bans and immigration proceedings.
In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000