Einreiseverbot
DE EN BKS
Menü
Entry ban

Integration evidence in proceedings against an entry ban

Integration evidence against an entry ban: how German skills, work and social ties work in the balancing under section 9 BFA-VG and limit the duration under section 53 FPG.

Mag. Mirela Saric
Your contact person

Mag. Mirela Saric

Attorney at law · German and BCS

Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.

Call directly +43 662 6280000 WhatsApp Send email Book initial consultation (72 euros)
2 July 2026 · Mag. Mirela Saric, Attorney at Law

Anyone challenging an entry ban should make their integration visible. German language skills, work and social ties are not mere formalities. They are concrete arguments in the legal review of the measure.

In the proceedings this integration evidence is taken into account in the balancing of interests under section 9 BFA-VG and within the framework of Article 8 ECHR. The better the ties are evidenced, the more heavily they weigh against the public interest in an entry ban.

The short self-check below helps you place the available evidence. We then show which features count and how they affect proportionality and duration.

Place your situation

How well can you evidence your integration?

Answer one or two questions about your evidence. You will receive a first orientation for the balancing under section 9 BFA-VG.

Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.

01 Question 1

What integration evidence can you present?

German language skills, work and social ties have effect in the balancing under section 9 BFA-VG. The better evidenced, the stronger.

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

Evidenced integration over several years weighs heavily in the balancing.

Anyone who can prove German language skills, work and settled social ties over several years brings weighty arguments into the balancing of interests under section 9 BFA-VG. These features strengthen the protection of private and family life under Article 8 ECHR and affect proportionality.

Bundle the evidence and arrange it clearly. The more coherent the picture of integration, the stronger the objection against the duration set under section 53 FPG.

02

Individual evidence is available, the picture can still be sharpened.

Where first integration features exist but are not fully evidenced, careful preparation is worthwhile. Even individual evidence of German skills, employment or voluntary work feeds into the balancing under section 9 BFA-VG. What matters is presenting the existing ties in a comprehensible way.

Supplement missing evidence as far as possible. A coherent presentation improves the argument against a disproportionate entry ban and its duration under section 53 FPG.

03

Where evidence is missing, integration should first be made visible.

If hardly any evidence is available so far, that does not mean there is no integration. Much is simply not yet documented. Check which ties you can prove, for example through language courses, employment, club life or your circle of friends in Austria.

A structured stocktaking makes integration visible for the balancing under section 9 BFA-VG. That is the basis for questioning the proportionality and the duration under section 53 FPG.

Which integration evidence counts

In the balancing the authority considers a range of integration features. These include above all German language skills, regular employment, a secured residence as well as social and cultural ties in Austria. Voluntary work and the circle of friends can also play a role. The denser this network, the stronger its effect in the review of proportionality.

It is important that the features are evidenced. A language certificate, an employment contract, pay records and confirmations from clubs or employers make integration comprehensible. Mere assertions carry little weight in the balancing.

The length of stay strengthens the effect of this evidence. Anyone who has lived, worked and taken part in social life in Austria for years presents a coherent picture which the authority must appreciate in the balancing under section 9 BFA-VG.

Effect on proportionality and duration

Integration evidence feeds directly into the review of proportionality through the balancing of interests under section 9 BFA-VG and Article 8 ECHR. Where the personal ties outweigh the public interest, the entry ban may be impermissible or at least due to be shortened in its duration.

Proportionality limits the duration set under section 53 FPG. Evidenced integration is therefore a lever to question a duration set too long. How the protection of private and family life works here is explained by the focus page on family and private life under the ECHR.

An appeal against the decision of the BFA goes to the Federal Administrative Court. It should present the integration evidence in an ordered way and set out concretely why the authority underestimated these ties.

Important on the evidence: Integration only has effect where it is evidenced and presented in an ordered way. Gather language certificates, employment contract, pay records and confirmations early on. A coherent presentation strengthens the objection against a disproportionate duration. When in doubt arrange an initial consultation (72 euros) quickly.

FAQ

Integration evidence in the proceedings.

Which integration evidence is particularly important? +

Particularly important are German language skills, regular employment, a secured residence as well as social and family ties in Austria. These features feed into the balancing under section 9 BFA-VG. Evidence such as certificates, an employment contract and confirmations is decisive, because mere assertions carry little weight.

How does integration evidence affect the ban? +

It feeds into the review of proportionality through the balancing under section 9 BFA-VG and Article 8 ECHR. Where the personal ties prevail, the entry ban may be impermissible or due to be shortened in its duration. Proportionality limits the duration set under section 53 FPG.

Is it enough just to assert integration? +

No. In the balancing it is above all evidenced features that carry weight. A language certificate, an employment contract, pay records and confirmations from clubs or employers make integration comprehensible. An ordered presentation of the evidence clearly improves the argument.

Go deeper

Related topics and terms

Family and private life under the ECHR

How integration and ties work in the balancing.

Proportionality

How proportionality limits the duration of an entry ban.

Private and family life

What falls under the protection of Article 8 ECHR.

Topics
Entry banIntegrationProportionalityBFA-VG

Entry ban, return decision, a running appeal deadline?

In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.

+43 662 6280000 [email protected] Book initial consultation (72 euros)
Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg