Einreiseverbot
Entry ban

Lifting or shortening an entry ban under Section 60 FPG

Lifting or shortening an entry ban under section 60 FPG: changed circumstances, timely departure and the application with the BFA, distinguished from section 53 FPG.

Mag. Mirela Saric
Your contact person

Mag. Mirela Saric

Attorney at law · German and BCS

Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.

26 June 2026 · Mag. Mirela Saric, Attorney at Law

A final entry ban is not a permanent state. The Aliens Police Act expressly provides for the option to lift or shorten an existing entry ban. The basis for this is Section 60 FPG. This article explains when such an application makes sense and what matters.

A clean separation of the legal bases is important. The imposition and duration of an entry ban follow Section 53 FPG and rest on a risk assessment. The later lifting or shortening, by contrast, follows from Section 60 FPG and requires changed circumstances.

The short self-check below helps you place your own situation. We then explain the requirements of an application and the route via the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum.

Place your situation

Does a lifting or shortening under Section 60 FPG come into consideration?

Answer one or two questions about finality and changed circumstances. You will receive a first orientation on the next steps.

Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.

01 Question 1

Is the entry ban already final?

An application to lift or shorten the ban under Section 60 FPG requires the ban to exist. As long as an appeal against the imposition is still possible, the route via Section 53 FPG comes first.

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

Changed circumstances support an application under Section 60 FPG.

If circumstances have clearly changed since the ban was imposed, an application to lift or shorten the entry ban under Section 60 FPG comes into consideration. What matters is that the original risk assessment under Section 53 FPG no longer carries the same weight. Departure within the deadline and a period without offences are often significant arguments.

Document the change carefully and file the application with the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum. The more concretely the new circumstances are evidenced, the stronger the application.

02

Without changed circumstances an application has little prospect now.

If nothing material has changed since the ban was imposed, an application under Section 60 FPG lacks a supporting basis. The authority examines whether the grounds of the original risk assessment under Section 53 FPG still apply. A premature application without new factors usually leads to rejection.

It makes sense to document the passage of time and your own development. As the offence-free period continues, the prospect of a later shortening grows.

03

Partly changed circumstances, a careful review brings clarity.

If some points have changed while others have stayed the same, a careful review is worthwhile. What matters is whether the changed circumstances are weighty enough to qualify the original risk assessment under Section 53 FPG. An application under Section 60 FPG can also aim at a shortening rather than a full lifting.

First sort out which changes are reliably evidenced. On this basis you can decide whether an application makes sense now or at a later stage.

04

The deadline is still running, this is first about the appeal.

As long as the appeal deadline against the decision is still open, the focus is not Section 60 FPG but the appeal against the imposition. The imposition and duration of the entry ban follow Section 53 FPG. An appeal filed in time to the Federal Administrative Court protects your rights.

Only once the decision is final does the route via Section 60 FPG come into consideration. First clarify whether the deadline is still open.

05

The stage of the proceedings is open and should be clarified first.

Whether an application under Section 60 FPG or an appeal against the imposition under Section 53 FPG is the right route depends on the stage of the proceedings. As long as it is unclear whether the decision is final, the appropriate step cannot be set. Check the service date and the running of the deadline.

Keep the decision and all proofs of service ready. They show which route is open.

Section 60 FPG is the basis for lifting and shortening

An existing entry ban can be lifted or shortened under Section 60 FPG where the relevant circumstances have changed since. The provision ties back to the original risk assessment and asks whether the grounds for the ban still apply for the duration set. What is decisive is therefore not the moment of imposition but the situation at the time of the decision on the application.

Section 60 FPG must be distinguished from Section 53 FPG. Section 53 FPG governs the imposition and duration of the entry ban and is the yardstick for the original decision. Section 60 FPG applies where the ban already exists and a later correction is at issue. Anyone who knows this separation chooses the right route. A deeper overview is provided by the focus page on lifting an entry ban.

Typical changed circumstances are a departure within the deadline, a period without offences or significant new ties at home or abroad. The authority weighs these circumstances against the original assessment.

The application with the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum

The application to lift or shorten the ban is filed with the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum. It should set out the changed circumstances concretely and support them with evidence. General statements are not enough, what is needed is comprehensible proof of departure, the passage of time and personal development.

A frequently important point is departure within the deadline. Anyone who left Austria in time as part of a voluntary departure can rely on this as a changed circumstance. The entry on voluntary departure explains more about this step.

If the application is rejected, an appeal to the Federal Administrative Court is open. As a rule the deadline is four weeks from service. A well prepared application increases the prospect of a sound decision from the outset.

Important: An application under Section 60 FPG without comprehensibly changed circumstances usually leads to rejection. First gather the evidence and sort out what has actually changed since the ban was imposed. When in doubt it helps to arrange an initial consultation (72 euros).

FAQ

Lifting and shortening under Section 60 FPG.

How do Section 53 FPG and Section 60 FPG differ? +

Section 53 FPG governs the imposition and duration of an entry ban on the basis of a risk assessment. Section 60 FPG is the basis for the later lifting or shortening of a ban that already exists. An application to lift or shorten therefore proceeds under Section 60 FPG.

Which changed circumstances are relevant for Section 60 FPG? +

Among others a departure within the deadline, a period without offences and significant new ties may be considered. The authority examines whether the original risk assessment still carries for the duration set. The circumstances should be concretely evidenced.

Where is the application filed and what applies on rejection? +

The application is filed with the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum. If it is rejected, an appeal can be brought against the decision to the Federal Administrative Court. As a rule the deadline is four weeks from service of the decision.

Topics
Entry banSection 60 FPGLiftingShortening

Entry ban, return decision, a running appeal deadline?

In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg