Deadline and reasoning now come first.
After service of a decision or ruling, the service date, operative points and reasoning should be checked immediately. Only then can the suitable remedy or application be chosen.
Entry ban
Marriage of convenience and deception: can an entry ban follow?
When alleged marriage of convenience, partnership or adoption can matter for an Austrian entry ban.
Your contact person
Mag. Mirela Saric
Attorney at law · German and BCS
Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.
7 July 2026 · Mag. Mirela Saric, Attorney at Law
An allegation of marriage of convenience, partnership of convenience or adoption for residence purposes is serious. It questions personal relationships and may also lead to an entry ban.
Section 53 FPG expressly refers to such circumvention constellations. Still, the authority must establish concrete facts and weigh the personal situation.
This article explains the review points, practical evidence and the role of Article 8 ECHR.
Place your situation
Which review is important now?
Answer one short question. You will receive first orientation on the next review points.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
At which stage is your case?
The first orientation does not replace advice but shows which documents and deadlines matter immediately.
All paths at a glance
Overview of all answers.
In pending proceedings, complete records matter.
While the proceeding is pending, evidence, chronology and submissions can be prepared. The concrete allegation or review point must be addressed precisely.
Before new steps, clarify the data situation.
Anyone planning travel, an application or re-entry should first check old decisions, SIS indications and existing bans. Planning does not replace legal clearing.
Legal starting point for deception allegations
Legal starting point for deception allegations
The key question is whether a marriage, registered partnership or adoption was relied on for residence, citizenship, labour-market access or to avoid removal without genuine family life.
A decision must state concrete facts. A general suspicion or moral assessment is not enough.
Proportionality remains important even where the allegation is serious.
Evidence and counterarguments
Evidence and counterarguments
Evidence may include household records, communication, travel, financial links, photos and statements from persons who know the relationship.
Unusual circumstances must be separated from proof of deception. Cross-border relationships can have explainable gaps.
Contradictions should be addressed openly and supported with documents.
Appeal, deadline and practical order
Appeal, deadline and practical order
If a decision has been served, the deadline comes first. Then facts, assessment of evidence and legal reasoning should be separated.
A BVwG hearing may matter where credibility and relationship history need to be explained.
The tone should remain factual. The aim is to make the decision reviewable.
Practice point: Mark every fact on which the authority relies and place your evidence of real family life next to it.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions on this focus.
Does this topic automatically mean an entry ban? +
No. The concrete decision, legal basis and reasoning of the authority remain decisive. This article only shows typical review points.
Which records should I secure first? +
The decision, proof of service, previous applications, earlier rulings and evidence of personal circumstances are the starting point. Further documents depend on the topic.
Can general information resolve the individual case? +
No. General information helps preparation. The next step depends on the decision, procedural stage and evidence.
Topics
Marriage of convenienceDeceptionEntry banArticle 8 ECHR
Entry ban, return decision, a running appeal deadline?
In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000