The specified place must be compared with the decision.
Check whether the decision names a specific accommodation, area or other instruction. Duties and proof depend on that wording.
Proceedings
Residence requirement under section 57 FPG: when the BFA specifies where to stay
A residence requirement under section 57 FPG is more than an address. Decision, information duties and remedies matter.
Your contact person
Mag. Mirela Saric
Attorney at law · German and BCS
Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.
11 August 2026 · Mag. Mirela Saric, Attorney at Law
A residence requirement under section 57 FPG can become the practical core issue in return proceedings. It is not merely an address note, but may define where a person must stay during the procedure.
This article does not repeat the general topics of registration, accommodation or address for service. It focuses on the formal residence requirement as a separate authority order.
Decision, reasoning, information duties under section 58 FPG, service and the remedy route should be reviewed together.
Assess your situation
Which question comes first?
Answer one short question. The assessment shows whether place, service or remedy should be prioritised.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
What is unclear about the residence requirement?
Section 57 FPG concerns a formal order. It is not just a general address issue.
All paths at a glance
Overview of all answers.
Contact and service are not the same.
A residence requirement concerns where a person stays. Address for service, availability and registration duties may remain separate issues.
Deadlines run despite uncertainty.
If the residence requirement is to be challenged, review service and the appeal route immediately and set the next step according to the specific deadline.
A residence requirement is not just an address
A residence requirement is not just an address
The article on registration, accommodation and address covers general communication issues. Section 57 FPG is narrower because it can impose a specific order.
The order may specify where the person has to stay. Practical duties then run alongside appeal deadlines and other cooperation duties.
Whether the order is lawful and proportionate depends on the individual file.
Information duties and service remain separate
Information duties and service remain separate
Section 58 FPG concerns information duties around such orders. The decision should be read beyond its heading.
Service remains a separate issue. The article on the address for service explains why outdated addresses are risky.
A residence requirement may support availability. It does not automatically solve service problems.
Legal protection depends on the decision
Legal protection depends on the decision
If a residence requirement is issued together with a return decision or entry ban, the decision must be reviewed as a whole. The page on BFA, BVwG and VwGH proceedings explains the route.
A power of attorney can help coordinate file inspection and deadlines. See the article on representation in immigration proceedings.
The requirement should not be assessed separately from the authority's reasoning.
Practice point: For a residence requirement, copy the place, start date, duration and appeal instruction exactly from the decision. Any deviation needs documentation.
Newsletter: You can follow developments on entry bans, residence matters and immigration deadlines through the Brandauer newsletter.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions on residence requirements.
Is a residence requirement the same as registration? +
No. There can be overlap, but a residence requirement under section 57 FPG must be reviewed as a separate order.
Can I simply change where I stay? +
That depends on the decision. If a place is specified, changes should not be made without review and documentation.
Is there a separate deadline? +
This depends on the decision and appeal instruction. Service and deadline start should be reviewed immediately.
Topics
Residence requirementBFAReturn decisionProceedings
Entry ban, return decision, a running appeal deadline?
In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Contact
A direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000