What tolerated stay under section 46a FPG means, why it is not a residence title and how it relates to return decisions and entry bans.
Mag. Mirela Saric
Attorney at law · German and BCS
Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.
Tolerated stay and the tolerated-stay card: what it means for an entry ban is a narrow practical Detailfrage in Austrian immigration law. Looking only at the general entry ban can miss the fact that this issue has its own requirements, evidence and procedural questions.
The decisive question is why deportation is currently not possible and whether a return decision or entry ban remains in force alongside it.
The notes do not replace assessment of the individual case. They show which documents and questions you can prepare before an initial legal consultation.
Answer three short questions. The assessment shows which documents and next steps fit this topic.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
The tolerated-stay card is not a residence title. The key issue is why deportation is not carried out and what that means for return decision and entry ban.
Tolerated stay may matter when deportation cannot be carried out for specific reasons. It does not replace review of return decision, entry ban or residence title.
The concrete reason should be proven and separated from mere delay.
For the tolerated-stay card, current documents, authority requests and changes in personal circumstances are important. Extension and loss should not be clarified only after expiry.
Document service, validity dates and every new authority communication.
If you want to derive a residence title or the end of an entry ban from tolerated stay, this needs a separate legal review. Tolerated stay and humanitarian residence are different levels.
It should be checked whether an application, shortening request or other step fits at all.
Tolerated stay under section 46a FPG describes a specific situation in which deportation is temporarily not carried out. It is not a general residence title and does not automatically lift an entry ban.
Affected persons need to keep the levels apart: decision, appeal, enforcement and later applications do not always follow the same logic. The operative part of the decision should therefore be read first.
Even apparently small formulations can matter. Whether a measure is based on a return decision, residence ban, entry ban or enforcement issue determines the next steps.
The starting point is the full decision, proof of service, previous applications, earlier decisions and documents on the personal situation. Depending on the topic, medical records, family documents, residence cards, employment confirmations or translations may be added.
A short chronology is important. When was something applied for, served, answered or supplemented? This sequence helps identify open deadlines and possible gaps.
Documents should not be collected at random. It is better to arrange them by operative point, evidence topic and date. This makes it easier to see which arguments are already supported and what is missing.
The decisive question is why deportation is currently not possible and whether a return decision or entry ban remains in force alongside it.
The general articles on return decision, entry ban, section 50 FPG and residence titles remain the anchors. This article only deepens the specific sub-question so that no second general overview is created.
Practice point: First check the operative part of the decision. Many errors arise when return decision, entry ban, residence ban, enforcement and later applications are treated as one issue.
Yes, as a specific assessment focus. It does not replace the general appeal review, but it shows which concrete sub-question in the decision or proceedings may matter.
The decision, proof of service, previous applications, earlier decisions and documents on the personal situation are the starting point. Further evidence is added according to the topic.
No. General information helps with preparation. Whether a step makes sense depends on the decision, the procedural status and the evidence.
The basic difference between the obligation to depart and a re-entry bar.
Why risk in the country of return and the entry ban must be assessed separately.
Which documents matter for an initial legal assessment.
In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000