Einreiseverbot
Proceedings

Oral hearing before the BVwG in an entry-ban case

How to prepare an oral hearing before the BVwG in an entry-ban case and which evidence matters.

Mag. Mirela Saric
Your contact person

Mag. Mirela Saric

Attorney at law · German and BCS

Mirela Saric assists clients in immigration matters with a clear structure: review the decision, secure deadlines, define the strategy and act quickly. She advises in German and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.

4 July 2026 · Mag. Mirela Saric, Attorney at Law

Not every entry-ban proceeding remains a paper review. Before the Federal Administrative Court an oral hearing may become decisive where personal circumstances, risk assessment or family life must be clarified.

For those affected, the hearing is often the first opportunity to present their situation personally and in an orderly way. Preparation matters more than spontaneous justification.

This article shows which questions should typically be prepared and which evidence counts in return-decision and entry-ban cases.

Place your situation

Has a BVwG hearing already been scheduled?

Answer one short question. You will receive a first orientation on the next review points.

Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.

01 Question 1

Has a BVwG hearing already been scheduled?

The first orientation does not replace advice but shows which point should be clarified immediately.

All paths at a glance

Overview of all answers.

01

The Verhandlungstermin verlangt Vorbereitung.

The situation should be reviewed promptly on the basis of the decision, proof of service and the concrete personal circumstances. The next step depends on the procedural stage.

02

Auch ohne Termin sollten Beweise geordnet werden.

The situation should be reviewed promptly on the basis of the decision, proof of service and the concrete personal circumstances. The next step depends on the procedural stage.

03

The proceeding is still at an early stage.

The situation should be reviewed promptly on the basis of the decision, proof of service and the concrete personal circumstances. The next step depends on the procedural stage.

What the court clarifies in the hearing

The BVwG can review facts and legal questions comprehensively. A hearing often concerns length of stay, family, work, integration and the current risk assessment. In Article 8 ECHR matters, a coherent account of the real life situation is decisive.

The hearing does not replace the written appeal. It complements it. Anyone who first produces evidence there in an unstructured way often loses opportunities. The page on proceedings before BFA, BVwG and VwGH explains the chain of instances.

Which evidence should be prepared

Important are records on identity, length of stay, registration history, family, work, education, German skills and any good conduct. Where children and family members are involved, concrete care and dependency relationships matter.

Negative points should not be ignored either. The authority often bases an entry ban on a risk assessment. It must be explained objectively what has changed and why no current danger exists.

Practice point: Do not bring only isolated documents to the hearing. The decisive point is a clear evidence line: which fact is each document meant to prove?

FAQ

Oral hearing before the BVwG in an entry-ban case

Does the BVwG always hold a hearing? +

No. Whether an oral hearing takes place depends on the proceeding and the need for clarification. Where personal circumstances or disputed facts are central, it can become especially important.

What role does Article 8 ECHR play? +

Article 8 ECHR protects private and family life. In the hearing, concrete ties, care duties and integration can be explained. General assertions are not enough.

Should I bring new evidence only at the hearing? +

No. Evidence should be submitted as early and as orderly as possible. In the hearing it can be explained what the documents mean and why they matter for the balancing exercise.

Topics
BVwGHearingEvidenceEntry ban

Entry ban, return decision, a running appeal deadline?

In immigration law, deadlines and the right argumentation decide. Call us directly or send an email, callback within one business day.

Contact

A direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg